|
|
What to Know for Friday, June 12th, 2026: |
1: No stimulus checks or tariff refunds for individual Americans in 2026 — Trump's $2,000 "tariff dividend" never approved by Congress |
 |
(Image Credit: Getty Images) |
|
Billions in tariff refunds underway but going to businesses/importers, not consumers: Supreme Court February 2026 ruling required tariffs imposed under emergency powers refunded — Customs and Border Protection launched CAPE program April 2026 processing refunds to importers and brokers, not individual consumers — Americans who indirectly paid higher prices through tariffs have no confirmed direct payment plan yet, leaving key question open about consumer relief. Trump's $2,000 "tariff dividend" proposal never approved — remains just an idea: President proposed direct checks to taxpayers but Congress never passed legislation authorizing payments and IRS hasn't announced any checks — Sen. Martin Heinrich proposed Tariff Refunds for Working Families Act ($600 individuals/$2,400 families), Rep. Henry Cuellar filed American Consumer Tariff Rebate Act ($1,020-$2,040 depending on filing status), but none approved to date. Chances of broad rebate checks low despite lawmakers' proposals: Multiple lawmakers proposed ideas mirroring Trump's tariff dividend and pandemic stimulus checks, but none passed Congress or received IRS approval — experts say chances of households receiving direct payments diminished after court rulings shifted focus toward refunding businesses first — any future payments would require new legislation, clear eligibility rules, and funding.
|
➜ Read the full article from USA Today via Delaware Online here. |
|
|
2: Social Security benefits "reasonable" at 36% replacement rate — no evidence of "runaway" system, U.S. below OECD average |
Medium earner benefits replace just 36% of pre-retirement income — lower than original program, below OECD average: Replacement rates show 36% for medium workers (higher for low earners, lower for high earners) — reduced from exceedingly high rates in 1970s due to indexation error — U.S. replacement rates somewhat lower than OECD average across all wage levels — public spending on retirement programs slightly below OECD average — "looking at benefit levels and replacement rates...provides no evidence for a 'runaway' retirement system." Actuarial adjustments designed so typical person receives same lifetime benefits whenever they claim (62-70): Reduced monthly benefits available at 62, highest at 70 — claiming adjustments theoretically actuarially fair — U.S. normal retirement age 67 (joined 67 group in 2025), compared to OECD average 64.7 for men, 63.9 for women — system provides flexibility without excessive generosity. Real issue: life expectancy gap by earnings undermines progressive design — high earners get disproportionate share: Low-income workers die earlier, high-income workers live much longer — this "disproportionate share of benefits goes to high earners who claim large benefits unreduced for early-retirement penalties, and who live for a very long time" — "achieving a better distribution of benefits should be a key factor in any package to solve Social Security's financial shortfall" rather than across-the-board cuts.
|
|
|
➜ Read the full article from Center for Retirement Research here. |
|
|
|
|
3: Medicare Advantage insurers denying 50-80% of long-term care requests — but 92-99.7% overturned on appeal after week-long delays |
|
|
Aetna denied 80%, UnitedHealthcare and Humana 70% of long-term hospital care requests in June 2024: Office of Inspector General report examined 2,000+ cases, found for-profit insurers dominating MA plans (covering 35 million beneficiaries) routinely denied post-hospital care — for inpatient rehab: UnitedHealthcare 64% denials, Humana/Aetna ~50% — pattern suggests "financial incentives may be partially driving higher denial rates," with for-profits denying more often than nonprofit plans. Nearly all denials overturned on appeal but only after 6-day delays — patients stuck in hospital, facing psychological and clinical harm: UnitedHealthcare reversed 99.7% of nursing home denials on appeal, Aetna 98.2%, Humana 92.1% — denials typically overturned within 6 days, meaning patients waited week+ in hospital before discharge to rehab — OIG noted "waiting extra five or six days in hospital can have big psychological impact" and "delaying access to post-acute rehab can have clinical impacts on patients." Most seniors don't appeal initial denials, leaving "vast majority without care" — CMS collecting data and seeking commitments to improve: Only small percentage of initial denials appealed, so most beneficiaries go without necessary care — contractors like NaviHealth (UnitedHealth subsidiary) use algorithms denying care more often than insurers themselves — OIG urging action as MA enrollment grows; CMS says conducting audits and "secured commitments" from plans but critics say system "designed to reflexively deny care."
|
➜ Read the full article from the Washington Post here. |
 |
|
Free Medicare Help with Chapter |
90% of American seniors are on the wrong Medicare plan. Thankfully, Chapter is here to help! They can help you switch to the right plan and save $$$. Chapter saves the average senior $1,100 per year! Plus, it is 100% risk-free! Give them a call to find out how much you could save: 539-205-2147. |
askchapter.org/insider |
|
|
|
|
|
Here’s What You Missed on YouTube: |
Check out our new YouTube videos for Friday, June 12th. |
Your Social Security Check vs. 51.8 Million Americans | 2026 SSA Ranking |
 |
Your Social Security Check vs. 51.8 Million Americans | 2026 SSA Ranking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This newsletter is for information only. Always confirm your options directly with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or a qualified advisor before making big decisions about your benefits. |
*View our Advertising Disclosure |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment