Invicti's Web Application Security Blog Updates for 13 Mar 2025

View this email in your browser Weekly Update – 13 Mar 2025 Missing X-Frame-Options header? You should be using CSP anyway When clickjacking attacks using iframes first became possible, browser vendors reacted by adding X-Frame-Options as a dedicated security header for controlling page embedding permissions. Learn how setting the right Content Security Policy makes up for a missing X-Frame-Options header today. The post Missing X-Frame-Options header? You should be using CSP anyway appeared first on Invicti.   More Recent Articles Missing HTTP security headers: Avoidable risk, easy fix DAST vs. penetration testing: Key similarities and differences DAST vs. SAST: Getting real on static and dynamic application security testing Is DAST only for web applications? A fact-check on vulnerability scanning What is vulnerability scanning and how do web vulnerability scanners work? Copyright © 2025 Invicti, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in as a Blog Subscribers.                                                                         Invicti Security Corp 1000 N Lamar Blvd Suite 300, Austin, TX 78703, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list